A talk which was included as a breakout session at the UKSG Annual Conference, April 12-14 2021.
Abstract:
In
the absence of funds for 'gold' open access, publishers may allow
universities to share the author's manuscript on a 'green' basis, with
or without an embargo. In the UK, the former means the work can be
openly accessed typically after a period of 12-24 months. Such time
gives publishers opportunity to build revenue, but creates inequalities.
Firstly, there is a division between those who can afford a fee or can
access a library subscription to benefit from the research and those
that cannot; but there is also a divide between universities that have
funds to pay publishing charges and less research intensive institutions
that have no such fund.
This case study considers journal
articles published by Edge Hill University in 2019. Originally a teacher
training college, the University received taught degree-awarding powers
its university title in 2006, followed by Research Degree Awarding
Powers in 2008. A key finding is that embargoes mean certain kinds of
research articles can be 'locked down' for longer. For instance,
educational journal articles were found to be held back from public
access for more than twice the time compared with health research. This
is driven by disseminating research through publishers who make
consistent use of embargoes.
As a result, the consumers of Edge
Hill's education research (e.g. schools, teachers) may need to wait
longer to use it. This can potentially affect their ability to use
research to innovate, enhance practice, or respond to societal
challenges.